How To Have A Good Meeting
HOW TO HAVE A GOOD MEETING
Grammar Pattern
Warm-up
Discuss these questions with your teacher before reading.
- How many meetings do you attend per week? Do you think all of them are necessary?
일주일에 몇 개의 회의에 참석하시나요? 모두 필요하다고 생각하시나요? - What is the biggest time-waster in meetings at your company?
회사 회의에서 가장 큰 시간 낭비 요소는 무엇인가요?
Vocabulary
Key words and expressions from the reading.
Reading
Read the passage with your teacher.
선생님과 함께 지문을 읽어보세요.
Grammar Pattern
First of all, consider whether the meeting is really necessary. To have a meeting just for the sake of it is a waste of time and resource. Could the business in hand be dealt with by a telephone call, an exchange of e-mails, an audio conferencing call or a video conference or could it simply wait until the next scheduled meeting?
If a meeting is necessary, make sure that the right people are going to be there. Too many people and the meeting is likely to be unproductive; too few and affected individuals are likely to feel excluded. If the meeting is of a standing body, extra individuals may need to be invited for particular agenda items.
Make sure than everyone knows in good time when and where the meeting will be held, who will be there, and what will be discussed. If you know that someone is out of the office or on holiday until just before the meeting, make special arrangements to advise them of the relevant details.
Make sure that everyone has the agenda, minutes of the previous meeting, and all the necessary supporting papers in good time for them to be read, considered, and consulted upon.
Provide a suitable room and ambience. Everyone should be able to sit in comfort and see each other. The room should be well-lit and well-ventilated. There may be a need for a flip chart and felt-tip pens or an overhead projector or a laptop for a PowerPoint presentation. If it is appropriate, flowers or fruit or candles may provide a pleasant atmosphere.
The meeting should start on time and finish on time - and everyone should know that this will be the case. This will encourage people to come along, knowing that the meeting will not go on endlessly, and it will encourage them to arrive for the scheduled start time, knowing that if they do not they will have missed some of the business.
The opening of a meeting is important. It helps if the chair briefly sets the scene and indicates the purpose or aims of the meeting. Some organisations like to open meetings with a few moments of stillness or contemplation, so that everyone mentally puts everything else to one side and focuses on the meeting and what they want out of it.
Each agenda item should have an appropriate time allocation, reflecting the importance of the item and the amount of discussion anticipated. This timetable should be a guide and not a straitjacket - it will assist a sensible prioritisation of business, but some flexibility will be necessary in the light of the amount of discussion which is found to be necessary and the strength of feeling on the controversial issues.
Consider having one or two short breaks. This will allow people to go the toilet or have a smoke and it is likely to help everyone to stay fresh and focused. If there is real tension over an issue, a short break may clear the air and allow a new approach.
The best meetings allow everyone to have a say and allocate the resultant work among the team members. If this does not seem to be happening, you can encourage the chair of the meeting with timely interventions along these lines: "I think that Jane would like to make a point", "I'd be interested to know what John thinks", and "Does everyone have something to do?"
The very best meetings generate new and exciting ideas. This is most likely to be achieved if everyone is allowed to express a view and not cut off or put down as soon as they appear to challenge the conventional wisdom or organisational orthodoxy, if everyone is encouraged to put forward suggestions even if at first they seem novel or counter-cultural, and if everyone really listens to what is being said and judges ideas on their merits and not on the basis of who put them forward.
Effective meetings should be action-orientated. Therefore, at the end of every agenda item, it should be clear what has been agreed, who is to be responsible for giving effect to this agreement, and what is the timescale for implementation. If this is not the case, say to the chair of the meeting:
"Before we leave this item, can I just be sure what we have agreed here?" or
"Can we just clarify who is going to be responsible for that decision?" or
"When do we want this to be done?"
The conclusion of a meeting is important. The chair should summarize what has been achieved or agreed, thank everyone for their contributions and support, and try to ensure that people leave the room feeling good about the time they have devoted to the meeting.
At the end of the meeting, you should be clear what you need to do as a result of the meeting and quickly carry out your action points or allocate them to a colleague. Delay will tend to lead to you overlooking your action points or postponing them to the last moment.
Minutes of meetings should be produced as soon as possible. They should focus on what has been agreed and make clear who is responsible for actioning each decision and what timescale is expected of that person. The minutes should be circulated not just to all those who attended, but also to those invited but unable to attend, to any other colleagues involved in any of the action points, and to others who need to know what is going on or who will be affected by the decisions.
Korean Trap
Korean speakers often make this mistake in meeting English.
한국어에는 관사가 없어서 a/the를 빠뜨리는 실수가 매우 흔합니다. meeting은 가산명사이므로 반드시 관사(a meeting / the meeting)를 사용하거나 복수형(meetings)으로 써야 합니다. 'Is it necessary to meeting'에서 to 뒤에는 동사원형 meet가 와야 합니다.
Discussion
Discuss these questions with your teacher after reading.
- The passage starts by asking "consider whether the meeting is really necessary." How many of your recent meetings could have been an email instead? What criteria should you use to decide?
본문이 '회의가 정말 필요한지 고려하라'로 시작합니다. 최근 회의 중 이메일로 대체할 수 있었던 것은 몇 개인가요? 결정하는 데 어떤 기준을 사용해야 하나요? - The text says "too many people and the meeting is likely to be unproductive; too few and affected individuals are likely to feel excluded." What is the ideal number of people for different types of meetings?
'너무 많으면 비생산적이고, 너무 적으면 관련자가 소외감을 느낀다'고 합니다. 다양한 유형의 회의에 이상적인 인원수는 몇 명인가요? - The passage emphasizes providing a "suitable room and ambience" including good lighting and ventilation. How much does the physical environment affect the quality of your meetings?
적절한 조명과 환기를 포함한 '적합한 공간과 분위기'를 강조합니다. 물리적 환경이 회의의 질에 얼마나 영향을 미치나요? - The text mentions distributing the agenda and papers "in good time." What does "in good time" mean to you — an hour before? A day before? What is the standard at your company?
안건과 자료를 '충분한 시간을 두고' 배포하라고 합니다. '충분한 시간'이란 얼마를 의미하나요 — 한 시간 전? 하루 전? 회사의 기준은 무엇인가요?
Lesson Summary / 수업 요약
Today's Topic: HOW TO HAVE A GOOD MEETING
Level: Business (BIZ)
Review this lesson before your next class! / 다음 수업 전에 복습하세요!