When Duty And Conscience Clash

고급 토론 (High Advanced)

Lesson 39

When Duty And Conscience Clash

💎
Lesson 39

WHEN DUTY AND CONSCIENCE CLASH

Practice English with your teacher

High Advanced 25 min Speaking 75%
3 min

Warm-up

Talk about these questions with your teacher.
선생님과 이야기해 보세요.

  1. What aspect of today's topic challenges your existing assumptions the most?
  2. If you could change one thing about how society approaches this issue, what would it be?
4 min

Vocabulary

Listen and repeat after your teacher.
선생님을 따라 읽어보세요.

convinced /kənˈvɪnst/
completely certain or sure about something  |  확신하는
Essentially, Rockwood was convinced of leaving his post
discipline /ˈdɪsəplɪn/
the practice of training to obey rules or a code of behavior  |  규율, 훈련
Every American solider, from the time he or she laces up that first pair of boots, is taught that discipline is the essence of military effectiveness
compromise /ˈkɑːmprəmaɪz/
a settlement in which each side makes concessions  |  타협, 절충
The concept of compromise is relevant to today's discussion.
integrity /ɪnˈtɛɡrəti/
the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles  |  성실, 진실성
The concept of integrity is relevant to today's discussion.
reluctant /rɪˈlʌktənt/
unwilling and hesitant  |  꺼리는, 마지못한
The concept of reluctant is relevant to today's discussion.
investment /ɪnˈvɛstmənt/
the action of investing money or time for profit or benefit  |  투자
The concept of investment is relevant to today's discussion.
advantage /ədˈvæntɪdʒ/
a condition giving a superior position  |  이점, 유리함
The concept of advantage is relevant to today's discussion.
5 min

Reading

Read the passage with your teacher.
선생님과 함께 지문을 읽어보세요.

The U.S. Army went on trial in Fort Drum, N.Y., last week ? even though Capt. Lawrence P. Rockwood was the one sitting in the dock. The verdict should make every American shudder. Finding Rockwood guilty on four counts, the military court unjustly punished a courageous man. The trial juxtaposed two principles ? a man’s obligation to his conscience and blind obedience to military orders. Essentially, Rockwood was convinced of leaving his post ? which he did in order to document subhuman conditions at a Haitian prison. No one put it better than Rockwood, who told the court, “I placed my loyalty to the constitution above my loyalty to the careers of my immediate superiors.”In my view, the case cuts to the heart of what kind of institution we want today’s military to be. Every American solider, from the time he or she laces up that first pair of boots, is taught that discipline is the essence of military effectiveness. But our warriors are also drilled to disregard illegal orders. During the Korean war, my company skipper ordered me to kill four Chinese prisoners our platoon had taken on a patrol near Kumhwa. The CO reasoned it would take eight hours to walk the prisoners back to the battalion; he didn’t want to take my soldiers away from the front for that long. I refused to carry out the order, citing the Geneva Convention. That was the end of it. Rockwood, a fourth-generation soldier with 15 years in the army, wasn’t so lucky.
Rockwood was safeguarding U.S. interests in Haiti last fall. During Operation Uphold Democracy, Rockwood, a counter-intelligence specialist, decided to carry out President Clinton’s explicit mandate “to stop brutal atrocities” ? the main reason we sent in troops. Rockwood, 36, tried to investigate human-rights abuses in Port-au-Prince’s National Penitentiary, a notorious hellhole where up to 500 undernourished prisoners, standing ankle-deep in excrement, were forced to share a single cell. The captain reported his concerns to at least eight officers on the staff of Maj. Gen. David C. Mead, then commander of the multinational force in Haiti. Rebuffed by everyone from his immediate superior to the division chaplain, Rockwood filed an inspector-general complaint, which was ignored. Concluding that his superiors were guilty of “criminal negligence,” Rockwood grabbed his M-16 and went to inspect the jail on his own. He made it only as far as the infirmary and a few cells before a military attache picked him up and charged him with, among other things, conduct unbecoming an officer.

5 min

Dialogue Practice

Practice the dialogue with your teacher.
선생님과 대화를 연습해 보세요.

(1) What was the main charge against Captain Rockwood
(2) What action did he take to warrant the charges against him?
(3) Describe the alleged conditions he sought to investigate.

3 min

Korean Trap! / 한국인 실수 교정

Common mistakes Korean speakers make.
한국인이 자주 하는 실수를 알아봅시다.

❌ I am afraid of make mistakes.
✅ I am afraid of making mistakes.

전치사(of, about, in, at 등) 뒤에는 동명사(-ing)가 옵니다. 동사원형이 아닙니다.

5 min

Discussion

Share your thoughts with your teacher.
선생님과 의견을 나눠보세요.

  1. counts ? Distinct charges in an indictment
  2. The case cuts to the heart of what kind of institution we want today’s military to be.
  3. Conduct unbecoming an officer
3 min

Extra Practice

(1) Discipline is the top priority for the men in uniform. And military men are trained to disregard illegal orders. What would you do if given “legal” but inhumane orders like Rockwood? Would you blindly follow the orders or reject them?
(2) If you were arrested and tortured, and asked to reveal military secrets which endangered your fellow soldiers, what would you do? What if the enemy wanted you to publicly denounce policies or attitudes you were morally opposed to?
(3) Suppose a soldier revealed confidential information to save his life. Should we condemn him?
(4) Do you think military law must be stricter than civilian law? Why?

Lesson Summary / 수업 요약

Today's Topic: WHEN DUTY AND CONSCIENCE CLASH

Level: High Advanced (H.A)

Review this lesson before your next class! / 다음 수업 전에 복습하세요!