Private Tutoring
PRIVATE TUTORING
Practice English with your teacher
Warm-up
Talk about these questions with your teacher.
선생님과 이야기해 보세요.
- The passage describes private tutoring as both a "boon" to tutors and a "burden" to students and parents. Has anything changed about this dynamic in the decades since this was written?
- The text mentions 25% of family budgets going to education. Is this ratio still accurate today, and is it sustainable?
Vocabulary
Listen and repeat after your teacher.
선생님을 따라 읽어보세요.
Reading
Read the passage with your teacher.
선생님과 함께 지문을 읽어보세요.
A BURDEN ON PARENTS & STUDENTSSince the early 1980’s private tutoring of middle and high school students has been an off-again, on-again affair. Mainly because of the highly-competitive college entrance exam, it has became common practice in Korea for parents of middle or high school students to force their children to attend after-school classes at private academies, or “hagwons” as they are known in Korean.Parents with especially unmotivated students usually hire a private tutor, usually a college student, to give personalized instructions on the basic exam subjects of English, Korean, and mathematics.The private tutoring has been a boon to teachers and college students serving as private tutors but a burden to the young students who have to spend their teenage years sitting with their noses in books as well as a huge financial burden on their parents.1996 statistics showed that the average spending on education for families with middle and high school children was about 25% of the family budget. The actual amount spent to provide private classes for children was about 300,000 won per month, more than 2 times the amount spent for food, medical care, or for clothing.The financial burden on parents has been so great that private tutoring of middle or high school students was banned by the government during the 1980’s. Even worse that the fact that many families struggled to pay the exorbitant fees charged by private tutors and private institutes, students whose parents could not afford to pay for private lessons were placed at a severe disadvantage. Getting into college depended more money than on brains.In spite of the ban, however, it was hard for the government to stop the tutoring completely. The ban was unenforceable, so the government relented and permitted private tutoring to begin again. One of the reasons for the revision of the college entrance system was to wipe out the practice of private tutoring, but the exact opposite occurred. In the past English, Korean, and mathematics made up 60% of the test, so only those subjects needed extra study. But since students’ high school grades will now be one deciding factors for admission to college, private tutoring has been extended to include all subjects.
There doesn’t seem to be any easy way to end private tutoring. This is bad news for parents but good news for the thousands of college students who support themselves.
Dialogue Practice
Practice the dialogue with your teacher.
선생님과 대화를 연습해 보세요.
Questions for Discussion1. What is your view of private tutoring conducted by college students?2. Have you ever earned money as a private tutor? If so, when, and how was your experience? Was it enjoyable? Why or why not?3. What do you think of private academies (hagwons) teaching evening classes for high school students? Do you think they’re good, or do you wish they could be closed? Why do you think so?4. What do you think of the fees that are charged by private academies? by private tutors? Do you think the fees are too high or are they just right? Explain your opinion.5. If the educational system were changed enough to eliminate the need for private tutoring, how much of an affect would it have on college students who depend on the money? Would it have a big effect or not?
Korean Trap! / 한국인 실수 교정
Common mistakes Korean speakers make.
한국인이 자주 하는 실수를 알아봅시다.
'burden'은 명사이므로 'very burden'이 아니라 'a great burden'이 맞습니다. 또한 전치사는 'to'가 아니라 'on'을 쓰세요: 'a burden on someone'.
Discussion
Share your thoughts with your teacher.
선생님과 의견을 나눠보세요.
- The passage says parents "force their children to attend" hagwons. Is this coercion, or are parents doing what they believe is best in a competitive system?
- The government banned private tutoring in the 1980s. Was this an appropriate government intervention, or an infringement on personal freedom?
- The text mentions families spending more on education than on food, medical care, or clothing. What does this priority reveal about Korean values?
- Is the hagwon system a symptom of a broken educational system, or does it actually provide value that schools cannot?
- Some countries have minimal private tutoring cultures yet achieve excellent educational outcomes. What would it take for Korea to move away from its dependence on private tutoring?
Extra Practice
What other skills would you like to learn? ?Why?? Would you do by yourself (be tutored) or with others (in a class), and why?
Lesson Summary / 수업 요약
Today's Topic: PRIVATE TUTORING
Level: Low Advanced (L.A)
Review this lesson before your next class! / 다음 수업 전에 복습하세요!